The form of autism that Roo has is called Hyperlexia. He taught himself to read before he could talk. Hyperlexia is not exactly as it is often described online, by "experts" who do not live with our kids. It is more than just a splinter skill that is nothing more than decoding with no comprehension at all. I will describe it more fully in another post, but for now what is relevant is that it often leads to very, very early and advanced reading ability. For kids with Hyperlexia, reading comes naturally while oral language is a struggle to learn, in reverse of the usual experience in which children learn to talk as part of their natural development but most work to learn to read. Roo could read before he began to speak again at the age of 3.5 years. We know he was reading because he could play a memory game that involved matching pictures to the word for the picture. There were other signs as well, but that was the most irrefutable one. Hyperlexia is also on the autism spectrum and as such involves a significant social delay as well.
On the surface, Hyperlexia hardly sounds like a disability given the emphasis our society places on early academic achievement. Our society is preoccupied with the early childhood years- even the first year- as preparation to "get ahead" in academics later on. Letters and numbers decorate so many baby and child items (you don't realize how many until you have a child who is obsessed with them), and parents are forever pointing to the letters and making their sounds. Most people don't bat an eye or even notice this but I could not help but see it. Why? Because I am the mother of a child who read very very early, and is very advanced in reading ability. By the time he was 5 or 6 Roo could read anything you put in front of him. He struggled to interact with other kids in even a basic way or to express his basic needs. Reading ability is not the ticket to a happy and fulfilling life- not in the way that interpersonal skills are. When I see mothers of babies hold up block after block repeating the name of the letter pictured while the baby tried to make eye contact and giggle, all I can think of is what I would have given for Roo to have done that. I want to shake those mothers and tell them that games of peek-a-boo, and giggles, and bonding ARE the "work" of babies, not reading. Reading comes in time once the more important basics of social interaction are learned. The early reading is no prize when it comes at the cost of social connection.
For a long time I've struggled to put into words how I feel when I see people place academic interaction above social interaction with young kids, but I recently came across
an article in Psychology Today that said exactly what I had wanted to say. Here is a quote from the author, speaking about her counseling clients, that says what I have wanted to say myself:
"It's the "other stuff" of life that eludes them -- loving and being loved, balancing their lives, managing their emotions, living a life of meaning and depth. Almost without exception, their early experiences of connection with their parents -- their attachment -- looms large in how they got here.
What does this have to do with babies and reading, and those horrendous advertisements for teaching your baby to read?
First and foremost: The fundamental task of early childhood isn't learning to read, or to "get ahead" for school, or to impress the neighbors, or to give the folks something to brag about. Encouraging children to surge ahead beyond their real developmental needs leaves them with some really sludgy clean-up to grapple with later on.
The most important task of early childhood is experiencing a healthy, secure attachment in which the child's caregivers are attuned to the child's inner state and respond in a contingent manner.Let me say that again. What kids need from the get-go is a parent who "gets" them, who pays attention to what's going on inside them, and who responds to them in a way that's actually related to what the kid is feeling. Healthy, secure, attuned attachment gives kids some much deeper "advantages" in life than whether they learn to read early."
The quote above is talking about pushing babies and children beyond their natural developmental paths and time frames. Some children, like Roo, are developmentally ready to read very young. When this happens it is not something that was taught or demanded of the child, it happened because the child was ready. I am not discouraging that at all, and we were quite grateful for Roo's reading as it was our bridge of communication for a long time. I'm just saying that it is not so wonderful that the natural work of babies- to connect and form the basis of a healthy emotional and social existence- should be sacrificed to achieve it.
